I'm freaking furious about this. This morning on KSL I read the following:
(KSL News) Marketers of Internet pornography say a law protecting kids against indecency violates the constitution.
They've filed a lawsuit against Utah, protesting the Child Protection Registry Act.
The law allows parents of minors to sign up to keep email accounts off the lists spammers use to send inappropriate messages. Those filing the suit say the law goes overboard."
I can't cry big enough elephant tears for this. I can't believe anyone is giving these pornographers the time of day let alone hearing a lawsuit from them stating that child protection laws are unconstitutional. UNCONSTITUTIONAL!! What's freaking unconstitutional about keeping children out of the hands of sicko predators?! I understand that there are loopholes in the child protection laws stating that photos can be taken if they're not sexual in nature, but Utah plugged those holes! I'm sorry, but if it were my child involved, I'd say screw constitutionality! Those [can't repeat word on the air] are not taking pictures of my children for any reason! I don't care if it's sexual or not because anything can be misconstrued to be sexual. Gol! I can't believe this. I hope this case gets tossed out on it's little snub nose.
|